Joshua's Question
Chanukah's eight days afford plenty of
time to ponder this festival's meaning, history, and even legitimacy. Chanukah's reason for being is the
rededication of the Temple's altar after its intentional desecration, at the
bidding of the Seleucid king who ruled over "Greater Syria" (of which
the land of Israel constituted one region).
Antiochus Epiphanes' cruel edicts against practicing YHVH's laws and
Jewish customs spurred a rebellion led by Mattathias the priest, of the order
of Jehojariv, and his five sons. Against all odds, they won a number of battles
– the few against the many. The historians tell us that, in time their numbers
grew as did their military capabilities in guerrilla warfare. But alas, those
victories were short-lived, and in the eighth and final battle, they sustained
heavy losses. This led them to call upon the Romans, with whom Judah the
Maccabee had already made a pact, who were just beginning to step onto the
world stage. Their negotiations on the behalf of the Judeans with the Seleucid
leadership resulted in almost one hundred years of autonomous rule over a widespread
territory.
It was at that time that the Hasmoneans seized
charge of the Temple, the center of religious, economic, and political life, as
priests (although not Zadokites), as well as, in their third generation, also
created a royal dynasty. This was, of course, a great affront to YHVH's laws of
clearly separating those two seats of power. What's more, in time, their rule
became corrupt and oppressive, with great internal discord. In order to settle
matters, the Romans were once again approached. Being only too glad to oblige,
they sent their General, Pompey. This move proved to be very costly –
territories were taken over and ultimately Judea lost its sovereignty, but not
the corruption that was now embedded in the local regime and line of successive
leaders.
With all this said, we still celebrate
the short-lived and miraculous victory. The rededication of the Temple altar, and
the lighting of what appears to have been a make-shift Menorah (since the real
one was stolen by Antiochus Epiphanes), draws attention to the Light of the
World, by whose Spirit we may purify and rededicate our lives to Him.
Daniel's accurate prophecies in chapter
11 of his book, concerning the military and political events that culminated in
the Chanukah story, present a template for the latter days, and once again underscore
this feast's significance. The eight days festivities also echo Succot, with
its own prophetic connotation, which at that time could not be celebrated at
its proper date and was thus pushed forward. The 'cruse of oil' story made its
way to Jewish sources only 800 years after the facts and is thought to be the
sages' way of diminishing the glory accorded to the Hasmonean family, of whom
they did not approve, to say the least.
Curiously, the prophet Haggai, in the second chapter of his book, makes
three references, with some prophetic significance, to the date which later became
the first day of Chanukah, namely the twenty-fourth of the ninth month.
So, how are we to view this somewhat
controversial occasion?
This question is reminiscent of Joshua's
question to the "man with the drawn sword": "Are You for us or for our adversaries?"
(Joshua 5:13). The answer was: "No, but as Commander of the
army of YHVH I have now come" (v. 14). When Yeshua was walking in the
Temple, in Solomon's porch, during Chanukah, He was well aware of this feast's
history, as well as of that which was about to happen to the very edifice that
He was now gracing with His presence (ref. John 10:27; Matt. 24:1-2). Living betwixt
and between the sordid past with its shortcomings and the foreboding future, in
clinging to the Master-Savior-Redeemer we can remain in a safety zone while He
sheds light on our present, as in His light we see light (ref. Ps. 36:9).
Amen. Yeshua is the only way to get perspective on all our celebrations! So sad that we have to uncover the "then man began" scenarios!
ReplyDelete