Aside from dealing with the purification rites of a post-birth woman, the beginning part of Parashat Tazri'a also touches on the eighth-day circumcision (12:3). Last week's Parasha was called "Shmini," meaning "eighth". And while the bulk of Parashat “Tazri'a” deals with regulations of "tzara’at" (leprosy and other skin conditions) it is the next Parasha that bears the name of the leper ("Me'tzorah"). Thus, even when there appears to be no connection between two successive Parashot (plural of Parasha), one is often threaded into the other, even if very loosely. However, that is not true of Parashat Me'tzorah, which forms a sequel to Parashat Tazri’a and is in fact very closely related to it.
"If a woman conceives seed [literal
translation] and gives birth to a male child, then she shall be unclean seven
days…" (12:2). "Conceives seed" - "tazri'a",
after which our Parasha is named, is a very unusual form since its root word
"zera" - z.r.a. -
(zayin, resh, ayin) is "seed" or "semen"
(and by implication also "offspring"). S.R. Hirsch translates it:
"When a woman has matured a human germ…" and goes on to comment:
"Germ, basically the seed of plants and hence herb-yielding seed (Gen.
1:11), the seed-forming activity of plants for the continuation of their
species, when applied to human beings is the usual term for the offspring by
which Man continues his generation. By
the use of the expression "tazri'a" here, which only occurs in
B’resheet (Genesis) 1:11 and 12, referring to the activity of plants for the
continuation of their species, the mother's role in producing progeny is looked
at in purely material physical character of its physiological process. Thus, with
one word the whole idea of the uncleanness, spoken of here, is shown" [[1]] In this manner Hirsch also provides one of several
answers to the question, "Why should a mother be declared 'unclean' for
fulfilling a Divinely-ordained mission?" The sages especially question the
need for a sin offering. [[2]] The
expression "tazri'a," however, brings to mind not only B’resheet
(Genesis) 1:11 and 12, as Hirsch points out, but is also reminiscent of the
usage of the term "zera," “seed” in B’resheet 3:15, where there is a reference
to the "Seed of the woman" Who is destined to crush the head of the
serpent. Thus, by one word the “purely material physical character” of birth is
singled out and at the same time also introduces its contrast – by an allusion
to the future “Seed of Woman.” The seven initial days of the woman's
"impurity" mentioned here, are comparable to the week of impurity
during the menstrual cycle.
However, in verse 5, where mention is made of the birth of a female, it is no longer “conception of a seed”, but rather… “to give birth”. Thus, in the birth of a son his future is already foretold, in that he will be carrying the seed, whereas if it is a daughter that is being born there is no need to mention the “seed”. We see here how the future generations are encompassed even in the life of an individual.
"When the days of her purification are fulfilled, whether for a son or a daughter, she shall bring to the priest a lamb of the first year as a burnt offering, and a young pigeon or a turtledove as a sin offering, to the door of the tabernacle of meeting" (12:6). The burnt offering, according to some of the sages, was a token of thankfulness to the Almighty for having preserved her through the labor pains and hazards, and for having been granted the strength to bear a child. "The new life within her made [the mother] deeply conscious of the greatness of the creator, as also of her insignificance as 'dust and ashes' and impurity; hence the need for a sin-offering. [3]
The sin offering may be linked to the fact that we are "brought forth in iniquity, and in sin my mother conceived me" (Ps. 51:5), as expressed by David. He was not pointing out to his mother as a sinner for having conceived him, but emphasized the fact that man's sin nature is hereditary, and simply passes through the bloodline. The fact that it is transmitted from generation to generation is illustrated by what we have already observed, that contained in Man is the seed for the perpetuity of his (sinful) race, and thus the fruit will resemble the parent plant. The unusual usage of "tazri'a" could therefore be the clue to unraveling the 'mystery' of the mother's "impurity" after giving birth, and the requirement of a sin offering. Incidentally, Miriam, Yeshua's mother, did likewise (ref. Luke 2:24), even though her son's conception had been totally different. In this case, following the Torah ruling was most likely performed in the same vein as Yeshua's immersion, which was for the purpose of "fulfilling all righteousness" (Mat. 3:15). The usage of "seed" in connection to bearing an offspring, therefore, underscores the heredity nature of sinfulness. But the "Seed of the woman" (Gen. 3:15) is a reminder that the sinless Seed will likewise be propagated after His own kind.
In one breath with the birth of "a male", mention is also made of the eighth-day circumcision (12:3). When we reviewed Parashat Shmini mention was made of the significance of the figure “eight” which stems from the root sh.m.n, being the root for “fat” (hence “oil - shemen"), following the fullness of seven ("sheva"), thereby indicating an overabundance (at times with negative connotations, such as "and Yeshurun waxed fat…" Deut. 32:15, emphasis added). The eighth-day circumcision also indicates that it takes precedence over Shabbat, and a child who is born on Friday, notwithstanding, will be circumcised on the following Shabbat. In this regard, take note of the connection between the “seventh” and the “eighth” day.
Having just encountered the “seed
conceiving” woman, we are now looking at the act of male circumcision, which
denotes the covenant in the flesh marking the organ of procreation, so that the
seed (“zera”) issuing forth would be ‘enrolled’ in the process of redemption
from the hereditary sin that we have just noted. If “tazr’ia,” as used for a woman, is
indicative of the perpetual seed of sin, then circumcision is a symbolic act
pointing to the beginning of the solution to the problem of the inbred sin in
the present condition of
The next part of the Parasha (chapter 13) is also devoted to issues of purity and impurity, this time relating to skin diseases, as well as to contaminated houses and clothes. Since dealing with this variety of conditions was up to the priests' discernment, they are the ones mentioned, and it is, therefore, A'haron who is addressed here (whereas he was not mentioned in the first part of the Parasha). The various conditions described and elaborated upon all come under the general heading of "tza'ra'at" (tz.r.a, tzadi, resh, ayin).
In spite of the many regulations regarding
"tzarat", there are no instances cited in the entire Tanach of these
regulations being put to practice and of lepers turning to the priesthood.
However, in the Brit Chadasha texts, in the Gospels there are several instances
of lepers being cleansed by Yeshua, who then admonished them to show themselves
to the priest (e.g. Matt. 8:2-4; Mark 1:40-44; Luke 17:12-14).
The root tz.r.a (tzadi, resh, ayin) means “project outward”. If the sins resulting in this affliction are mostly committed in secret, then this condition reveals them, whether on one’s body, clothing, or home. The New Brown, Driver, Briggs, Gesenius Lexicon defines the root verb "tza'ro'a" as "to throw down, prostrate, humble oneself"[[4]. The various forms of "tzara'at" certainly placed the one declared as contaminated in a humbling, if not a humiliating state, described in verses 45 and 46: "Now the leper on whom the sore is, his clothes shall be torn and his head bare; and he shall cover his mustache, and cry, `Unclean! Unclean!' He shall be unclean. All the days he has the sore he shall be unclean. He is unclean, and he shall dwell alone; his dwelling shall be outside the camp". The word for "unclean" is "tameh" (t.m.a, tet, mem, alef) with its literal meaning being "ritually polluted".
The concept, "outside the camp," like many others in Scripture, is twofold. Whereas here the "tameh" is separated from the community, in Shmot (Exodus) 33:7, after the Golden Calf episode we read: "Moses took his tent and pitched it outside the camp, far from the camp, and called it the tabernacle of meeting. And it came to pass that everyone who sought YHVH went out to the tabernacle of meeting which was outside the camp" (italics added). Likewise, in Hebrews 13:12-13: "Therefore Yeshua also, that He might sanctify the people with His own blood, suffered outside the gate. Therefore, let us go forth to Him, outside the camp, bearing His reproach". Hence this separation can be dual – disconnecting one’s self from a sin-contaminated camp, or, removing one’s self so as not to contaminate the camp.
The latter part of chapter 13 deals with “tzara’at” as it contaminates leather or clothes (vs. 47-59). Several times mention is made of “sh’ti va’erev”, that is, the “warp and woof” of the cloth (the threads woven lengthwise and crosswise respectively). The woof which is threaded through the warp is thought of as being “mixed in” and is therefore designated by the well-known term “erev” (ayin, resh, vet), which we have been following in many instances, but primarily in the word for “evening”, which is a state of light being mixed with darkness.
Nechama Leibowitz concludes: "According to most commentators tzara'at is not a common disease, but supernatural infliction by Divine Providence through which man is reminded of his sinful ways, and called upon to abandon them". The appended footnote says: "It is noteworthy that medical research fails to associate the Biblical tzara'at with any known disease. Its diagnosis as leprosy is rejected by modern medicine". Earlier the commentator pointed out that plagues in general had a special role as warning signs against sinful behavior [5], or were its consequences (e.g. 2nd Sam. 24:1, 15; 2 Ch. 26:16-21).
[[1]
] New Studies in Vayikra Part 1, Nechama
Leibowitz, trans. Aryeh Newman. Eliner Library,
Department for Torah Education and Culture in the Diaspora. Hemed Books Inc.,
]2[
Ibid
]3[
Ibid
]4[
The New Brown,
Driver, Briggs, Gesenius Lexicon, Francis Brown Hendrickson,
Publishers
]5[
New Studies
No comments:
Post a Comment