I have been really challenged this week
with some questions about the Ephraimite identity. As most of you know,
recently there have been some more attacks against this teaching, and the
teachers who are espousing, advocating, promoting the true history of the Word
of Elohim and its connection to the house of Jacob or the whole House of
Israel.
In order to build a structurally sound
house, firm foundations have to be laid. It is with this thought in mind that,
I am in the process of reexamining the Ephraimite/two house truths and
movement. Does it have those firm,
rock-solid foundations? I think most of
us have exhausted the proof from the Tanach (“Old Testament”) and Yeshua’s
parables and other sayings from the Gospels, but that is not sufficient without
the apostolic writings. One has to have
at least two or three witnesses in order to establish a matter. The apostolic
ingredient, therefore, is the catalyst, or agent that makes this mixture firm
and hard to disprove. “Now,
therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with
the saints and members of the household of Elohim, having been built on the foundation of the
apostles and prophets, Yeshua the Messiah Himself being the chief
cornerstone” (Ephesians 2:19-20). Yeshua is not only the cornerstone, He is the
foundation as He is the Spirit of the Word and the Messenger that proceeded
from Elohim: “For no other
foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Yeshua Messiah [and
His anointing]” (1 Corinthians 3:11).
Since Yeshua is the Word, we have to be
very careful that we do not pull Him apart into a “past” or “old Yeshua” and a
“new Yeshua”. “Yeshua Messiah is the
same yesterday, today, and forever” (Hebrews 13:8). The consistency of the Tanach and Renewed
Covenant must be flawless. However, with
two thousand years of a non-Israelite/Gentile Christianity it is very hard to
alter, change, or even modify the commonplace interpretations and translations
to a recognizable connection between the Torah, the Prophets, the Gospels, and
apostolic writings. It is, therefore, incumbent upon us to try
and do so, with the help and guidance of YHVH’s Spirit. If this is not attempted, the present move of
His Spirit, of turning the hearts of the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
back to those forefathers, will be stolen by religious spirits and taken to
Babylon/Rome or worse, given over to the hunters’ sword. We heard an Anglican
Bishop (charismatic assigned to the Vatican) quote that scripture but meaning
back to church fathers.
“But thanks be to YHVH, ‘For He will
finish the work and cut it short in righteousness, because YHVH will make a
short work upon the earth.’ And as Isaiah said before: ‘Unless YHVH Tzeva’ot
had left us a seed, we would have become like Sodom, and we would have been
made like Gomorrah’” (Romans
9:28-29). What seed/sperma is YHVH
Tzeva’ot concerned about? Would it not be the one that He Himself singled out,
when He said to Abraham that, “in Isaac your seed shall be called” (Genesis
12:21; Hebrews 11:18). What is so
special about Isaac? Why does the
apostle make such a big deal about pointing out this seed of Abraham that came
forth from Sarah’s womb? But not only
Sarah’s (womb), also Rebekah’s, who gave birth to a “chosen nation” - Jacob
(ref. Romans 9:9-12). Why is YHVH so concerned that His word would be of “no
effect” in relationship to this special seed in the Adamic race?
Many foreigners who were not related to
the called and chosen seed had linked themselves with Israel over the centuries
and assimilated. Additionally, there
were also those from Abraham’s other wives who had joined Israel. Thus the
apostle had to clarify and deal with this issue of Israel’s true identity: “But it is not that the word of Elohim has
taken no effect. For they are not all Israel who are of Israel, nor are they
all children because they are the seed of Abraham; but, ‘In Isaac your seed
shall be called.’ That is, those who are the children of the flesh, these
are not the children of Elohim; but the children of the promise are counted as
the seed. For this is the word of
promise: ‘At this time I will come and Sarah shall have a son’” (Romans
9:6-9, emphases added). YHVH
came to the dead and barren womb of Sarah and raised up an egg, a seed of woman
in which Abraham’s “sperma” fertilized.
Thus Isaac was not only a child of Abraham, but also YHVH’s miracle
child.
One of the reasons why the Tanach is not
considered carefully and not taken literally is because the above scripture is
interpreted as pointing to the one born of Miriam, and not of Sarah. The Church
felt compelled to explain the apostles’ writings from the stand point of
replacement theology or universalism, thus any seed/life will do, as long as it
can be joined by and to the doctrinal interpretation of the institution. This
is what Nimrod did when he built Babel and rallied all the family of Noah,
except Shem’s and Ever’s family, into His kingdom of the “mixed
multitude”. If Elohim has indeed
started over and abandoned His covenants and promises with the forefathers, why
would He have gone through all the trouble in the first place? Why would He replace His promised son Isaac
and His “chosen seed” Jacob with a mixed multitude?
Why should we pay any attention to the
“Old Testament” prophets? Perhaps Peter gives us a good reason to do so, “for
prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of Elohim spoke as they
were moved by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:21). Again, in the book of Acts we find the
following statement: "whom heaven must receive (in reference to
Yeshua) until the times of restoration of all things, which Elohim has
spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began” (3:21).
Yeshua came to redeem and restore this
chosen Family of Jacob and will set up His kingdom in those whom YHVH
predestined to be the called and chosen, as Moses prophesied: "… a holy
people to YHVH your Elohim; YHVH your Elohim has chosen you to be a people for
Himself, a special treasure above all the peoples on the face of the earth”
(Deuteronomy 7:6). Why would the
Almighty abandon His call upon His people and substitute them with a mixture of
some kind? This obviously would weaken
and even replace His own testimony as being faithful in keeping His covenants
with and promises to the forefathers. "YHVH
delighted only in your fathers, to love them; and He chose their seed after
them, you above all peoples, as it is this day” (Deuteronomy 10:15). “And you shall be to Me a kingdom of
priests and a holy nation.' These are the words which you shall speak to the
children of Israel" (Exodus 19:6).
In examining the writings of the
apostles, we have to keep in mind that they did not have the interpretations of
the “church fathers” from which to draw their understanding or
conclusions. Everything that they learned
was by the Holy Spirit of Messiah and was based and founded on the Tanach’s
facts and truths. When encountering Old Testament quotations in the Renewed
Covenant, a principle of referring to the original contexts of these verses
must be followed. The apostles may only use a verse or two from an entire
chapter, but without a shadow of a doubt they had read, studied, and
contemplated the whole book and its message.
Let’s take for example two scriptures from Hosea, who for some reason is
‘popular’ with Paul and Peter: “And Elohim said to him, Call her name Lo-Ruhamah:
for I will no longer have mercy on the house of Israel and I will utterly take
them away” (Hosea 1:6). “Then
said Elohim, Call his name Lo-Ammi: for you are not my people, and I will not
be your Elohim” (Hosea 1:9).
Was Peter referring to the same people
whom Hosea was addressing, when he wrote: “who once were not a people but
are now the people of Elohim, who had not obtained mercy but now have obtained
mercy” (1 Peter 2:10)? Or was he
speaking about a “mixed multitude”?
What was Paul thinking when he quoted the following from Hosea: "And
it shall come to pass in the place where it was said to them, 'You are not My
people (Lo Ami),' There they shall be called sons of the living Elohim"
(Romans 9:26; Hosea 1:10)? The apostle
then continues with a quote from Isaiah: “Isaiah also cries out concerning Israel: ‘Though
the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, the remnant
will be saved’” (Romans 9:27, 10:22).
The Hebrew word translated “saved” is actually “return” (shuv), and also
means “repent”. Was Paul referring to a
“mixed multitude”, or was he sticking to the literal seed of Isaac and Jacob
becoming so numerous that it would be impossible to count their offspring,
especially when they have lost their identity and have become “Lo Ami”? If he were numbering non-Israelites he would
have said so. Additionally, in Romans 9:6-9 Paul is defining the true Israel of
Elohim: “That is, those who are the children of the flesh, these are not the
children of Elohim; but the children of the promise are counted as the seed. For this is the word of promise: ‘At this time
I will come and Sarah shall have a son’” (vs. 8-9). Paul was not about to
make the prophetic word of Elohim of no effect.
We too should not be quick to jump to the ‘mixed multitude’ conclusion
or idea, as a mixture is descriptive of Babylon and replacement theology. It also has the effect of diluting the
faithfulness and righteous judgments of the Almighty Elohim.
Paul’s citation from Isaiah 10:22, in
regards to the numerous multitudes, is not an allegory, nor a “type or shadow”
(literary) device but a statement of fact, a reality, confirming the covenant
to the forefathers as well as the blessing to Joseph/Ephraim: “…and his seed
shall become a multitude of nations” (Genesis 48:19). Being the One “Who stretched out the
heavens and laid the foundations of the earth” (Isaiah 51:13), when He
makes a promise YHVH also oversees His word all the way to its implementation
and completion.
Did Elohim not say that He “watches
over His word to perform it”? “Therefore thus says YHVH, who redeemed Abraham, concerning
the house of Jacob: ‘Jacob shall not now be ashamed, nor shall his face now
grow pale; but when he sees his children, the work of My hands, in his
midst, they will hallow My name, and hallow the Holy One of Jacob, and fear the
Elohim of Israel’” (Isaiah 29:22-23 emphasis added). “For YHVH has ransomed Jacob, and redeemed
him from the hand of him who was stronger than he. And they shall come and shout for joy on
the height of Zion, and they shall be radiant over the bounty of YHVH…” (Jeremiah
31:11). Then again
from Isaiah: “So the ransomed of YHVH shall return and come to Zion
with singing, with everlasting joy on their heads. They shall obtain joy and
gladness; sorrow and sighing shall flee away” (51:11 emphasis added).
Obviously one only returns to a place if he had been there
sometime in the past. So how were we in Zion? The key seems to be in the returning,
first to our identity and then to the place called “Zion”, which
received its name from the people who were likewise named - “Zion”. “And I have put My words in your mouth; I have
covered you with the shadow of My hand, that I may plant the heavens, lay the
foundations of the earth, and say to Zion, 'You are My people" (Isaiah 51:16).
Let us take a look at the beginning of
this chapter (Isaiah 51), as it relates to the previous quote from verse
16. The prophet’s opening statement is very
interesting: "Listen to Me, you who follow after righteousness, you who
seek YHVH: Look to the rock from which you were hewn, and to the hole of the
pit from which you were dug. Look to
Abraham your father, and to Sarah who bore you; for I called him alone, and
blessed him and increased him" (Isaiah 51:1-2). Who is it that is being addressed here? Why “look to Abraham” and “to Sarah”? Is it because of YHVH’s provision of the
female side of Isaac’s conception? Was
that ovum in Sarah’s womb the “pit” from which we were dug? Is YHVH calling the female side of Isaac’s
life “Zion”? Take note, this is a question, and not an unequivocal conclusion. By the same token, is the “rock” that is mentioned
here the faith and life of our father Abraham?
Let us examine this label, or name, that
YHVH places over the head of His people - “Zion”. Interestingly, many in the world body of
nations look upon its derivation - “Zionism” - as being synonymous with racism.
In a totally different way, they may have a point… Peter quotes from the Torah
in order to identify these redeemed as: “…a chosen race, a royal
priesthood, a holy nation, a people for Elohim's own possession” (1Peter
2:9; Exodus 19:6). Scripture may not be
politically correct in the eyes of the world and its religious theology, but
YHVH does identify Zion as a race that came from the womb of Sarah. And it does
say that, the redeemed will return to Zion (ref. above), as they have been “redeemed
by the precious blood of their Messiah” (1 Peter 1:19), Who is their
kinsman Redeemer and the very foundation of “Zion”. “Therefore
thus says YHVH Elohim: ‘Behold, I lay in Zion a stone for a foundation, a tried
stone, a precious cornerstone, a sure foundation…’” (Isaiah 28:16; Mathew
21:42; Romans 9:11; 1Peter 2:6).
Both Paul and Peter use some very
significant words when describing YHVH’s point of view vis a vis His people,
calling them: “foreknown, predestined, called, chosen”: “For whom He foreknew, He also predestined
to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among
many brethren. Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He
called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also
glorified” (Romans 8:29-30).
Sometimes it is hard to wrap our brain
around the fact that the apostolic writings came by revelation understanding
from the Tanach (Old Testament). The New Covenant writers didn't have a
concordance with cross references to interpret things out of context. But unfortunately we have been influenced by
the church fathers’ and other theologians’ teachings that, the Scriptures prior
to Yeshua’s time are mere types or shadows and allegories with the substance
being fulfilled in “Christ”. The “Old”
has become irrelevant as it was “nailed to the cross” and has passed away. According to this teaching, Yeshua and the
Holy Spirit brought forth new ideas not related to the Torah and to the
prophets, while this new reality is consummated by a religion called
Christianity. However, as mentioned above, the foundation is built on the apostles and
prophets with Yeshua being the chief corner stone. Paul warns: “For no other foundation can
anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Yeshua Messiah” (1 Corinthians
3:11), for He is the “Word”. What did Paul mean by: “Do we then make void
the Torah through faith? Certainly not! Elohim forbid! May it never be! On the
contrary, we establish the Torah” (Romans 3:31)?
The restoration of our identity as the
“people of Zion”, descendants of our father Isaac ben Avraham who fathered in
the womb of his barren wife Rebekah a chosen nation “Jacob”, has created a
great dilemma. Most of those who have
come out of the darkness of religion into Yeshua’s marvelous light are faced
with a great problem, what do we do with the Torah of Moses? What did Paul mean by "we establish the Torah"? What is our relationship to it as redeemed
Israelites? As mentioned above, has YHVH’s instruction, His Word, become irrelevant as it was “nailed
to the cross” and is passing away? Or are they instructions for us to live by?
It is almost embarrassing to ask such a question as Yeshua, quoting from
Deuteronomy 8:3, says: “It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone, but
by every word that proceeds from the mouth of Elohim.'” (Matthew 4:4).
Instead of trying to explain what our
relationship is to the Torah now that we are redeemed Israelite, I would like to ask another question: why did YHVH have to appear at Mount Sinai in such a dramatic and grandiose way at
the giving of the Torah? Let us revisit the account: “Then it came to pass
on the third day, in the morning, that there were thunderings and lightnings,
and a thick cloud on the mountain; and the sound of the trumpet was very loud,
so that all the people who were in the camp trembled... Now
Mount Sinai was completely in smoke, because YHVH descended upon it in fire.
Its smoke ascended like the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mountain quaked
greatly. And when the
blast of the trumpet sounded long and became louder and louder Moses spoke”
(Exodus 19:16;18-19).
YHVH’s appearance in this manner and in
this way reminds me of a description in the book of Daniel: "His throne [YHVH's] was a fiery
flame, its wheels a burning fire; a fiery stream issued and came forth from
before Him. A thousand thousands ministered to Him; ten thousand times ten
thousand stood before Him" (Daniel 7:9-10).
Obviously the Divine appearance at Mount Sinai was no small matter. It
was as if the very throne room itself came with His presence.
The Almighty’s presence, power and authority showed up on this earth in a cosmos/world that was governed by Satan’s
principalities, powers, and rulers of the spirit world of darkness. The people could not even come close to the
mountain lest they die. YHVH’s arrival
was more than just making a covenant with Israel (as important as that was), as He already knew that they were totally
incapable of living by its conditions. As a matter of fact no man could live by
these Spiritual Laws. Because humanity was sold out to sin, they were slaves to it and
in bondage to that spiritual realm. Thus we must take a look at YHVH’s 'arrival' from an additional spiritual perspective.
In the first chapter of Genesis, we see that Elohim is already giving Torah instructions to His
newly created Man by telling him to “be fruitful multiply
and fill the earth,” and to have dominion and rule over the fifth and sixth day
creatures. However, nothing is said
about ruling over one another. Adam’s
children were given instructions to offer up to Elohim their first-fruit and
first born. Where did they get these
instruction? Most likely from their
father Adam who had eaten from the Tree of Life (YHVH’s instruction/Word) while
he was still living in the garden before 'getting the boot'. However, there was one Torah injunction in
regards to the “Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil: "Of every tree of
the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely
die" (Genesis 2:16-17).
It is very important that we understand
what actually took place there. As we
know from the creation story, “darkness was on the face of the deep” (Genesis
1:2). Satan’s kingdom was not allowed to interfere in the creation, nor in the
cosmos of Adam’s dominion. As long as man walked in obedience to the Creator,
he would be a channel of YHVH’s life and light to the rest the living
creatures. However, the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge was declared deadly should the man and woman eat of it.
Why was Satan so interested in Adam and Eve partaking of this tree, what
was in it for him? He knew that if he could get
the humans to partake of the forbidden tree, he would have access to their lives spiritually
and would be able to build his spiritual kingdom through them - they would become his
slaves. The apostle explains: “Therefore, just as through one man sin
entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men,
because all sinned” (Romans 5:12). When sin entered this world, Satan became the prince and power of the air, while man came under his dominion being ruled by the laws of sin and death. "Death reigned from Adam to Moses, even
over those who had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of
Adam" (Romans 5:14).
Before his 'fall' Adam was not 'under' law as
his nature was the same as his Creator's and therefore the law was part and parcel of his very being. He was manifesting in every way what we call the "fruit of the Spirit": “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering,
kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law” (Galatians 5:22-23). However, once Adam disobeyed the consequences followed instantly; when the nature of sin entered him, the laws of sin and
death came into operation. But in spite of this sad reality, this was Elohim's design. He created his son - Adam - as a natural seed that was "sown in corruption," but will be" raised in incorruptible" It [Adam the seed] is
sown in dishonor, but will be "raised in glory. It is sown in
weakness," but will be "raised in power. It is sown a natural body," but will be "raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and
there is a spiritual body" (1 Corinthians 15:42-44). Thus
Elohim did not impute sin to humanity from Adam until Moses. He had orchestrated it, so that, the real culprit the prince of this dark world would be judged.
When Elohim showed
up at Mount Sinai a change was brought to bear in this arrangement. YHVH’s Firstborn nation Israel, a chosen seed (Jacob) that He had
just redeemed from bondage and slavery and guided to this mountain, would be the first to experience this change. YHVH's appearance on the mountain was introducing a new 'factor' that He was causing to enter this world and to change its conditions. So what was it that took place then: "Moreover the Torah/law entered that
the offense might abound. But where sin abounded, grace abounded much more”
(Romans 5:20 emphasis added). What does it mean “Torah entered”? Entered into what? The Torah entered into this cosmos/world that
already had existing laws - the laws of sin and death. For the "entrance of sin into this world" the Greek word he used is “eiserchomai,” but for the "entrance of Torah" that word is modified to “pareiserchomai” which means, aside from "entering," also "parallel to" or "alongside of." Along side of what? The 'entrance' of Torah into this world implied that it would be 'alongside' of that which entered previously, that is sin. This created a new reality, a different 'arrangement.' What did this new arrangement mean legally and otherwise? Do we not observe Torah laws after the 'fall' and before Sinai? Of course we do: Cain and Abel knew to bring sacrifices and offerings, Noah knew to do the same. The latter also knew about clean and unclean animals. His sons knew that they were not to look on their father's nakedness. And it says about Abraham that he kept YHVH's Torah. So what difference did it make to mankind and his world when the Torah "entered in" at Sinai?
This is why we must see the Torah first and
foremost as “spiritual” For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold under
sin. (Romans 7:14).
Ephraim
www.israelitereturn.com